User blog comment:Mckrongs/Monster Hunter 4 for the Nintendo 3DS/@comment-4563270-20120920164736/@comment-4563270-20120920183712

but it baffles me as to WHY they skip out graphically when they could have excelled.. either it was A. rushed or B. they just re-did their mt framework for mh4 and screwed it up bad. Having played RE revelations I KNOW the 3ds is capable of rendering a pretty large world without lag and with only loading times being the draw back but in monster hunter it's all about loading times between map sections so what gives? I agree that content IS better than graphics but this is a case where as far as I can tell they could have BOTH but chose only one so y? y the disapointment? if you knew they COULD have made mh4 as good looking as mh3g with the content included but didn't anyway you can't tell me you still wouldn't be disapointed.