User blog comment:Mckrongs/Monster Hunter 4 for the Nintendo 3DS/@comment-5950847-20130924161514/@comment-4212769-20130925095551

It's not because you say that Deviljho is better than Rajang. It's because that you say it without any reasons, arguments and basis. That's a real no-go in vs. discussions. Everyone who says "Deviljho is better because it gave me more problems" makes an argument that has no relation to the topic as the difficulty for you has nothing to do with a fight between them.

A vs. fight needs to have a structure like this:

- Every argument found for both monsters

- A conclusion with those argument

And don't forget, "Deviljho wins because he's more badass!" is no argument!

Also saying "X wins..." is just idiotic as there is no fight where one monster would always win. There are only probabilities to how often out of a hundred fights a monster can win, without warranty.

And a great part of a fight are circumstances, conditions and luck. There's no fight like the other, there's so much that could unexpectedly happen in a battle. In the end a Great Jaggi could kill an Alatreon that is injured, exhausted, ill and sleeping. And Brachydios won't win every fight against Agnaktor just because it won one in the Ecology Video.

I said it once in the chat, my conclusion after most arguments that Arc has and the one that Jonasisaac has, knowing Rajang is able to evade most attacks is that Rajangs will have a probability to win about 64%.

In the end almost everyone will have its favorite win by keeping arguments back or not even giving arguments. And that's just because they didn't hear of neutrality...