User blog comment:Aandrew07/Discussion of the Week: Subspecies/@comment-1773866-20121023012615/@comment-208.125.139.98-20121024134301

Monster Hunter is a work of '''FICTION. Show me someone at capcom explaining how their '''world works and i will believe you. Until capcom releases a statement on this topic your ideas belong in the Mh theory discussion. Who's to say that evolution would work exactly like it does here in Capcoms fictitious universe? Capcom, not you. Furthermore, since when does mh perfectly mimic reality? because animals in real life can definately shoot lazers from their mouths.

My point is this: Blangonga totally could have gone into the desert and lived there for a couple million years and adapted to the environment.

I'd also like to point out a flaw in your thinking.( what i think is a flaw. i could be totally wrong but i dont think so.) You said that a common ancestor went to both the mountains and to the desert( im assuming that these ancestors came from a different region.) and then adapted to each region. then you seem to have said that blagonga could not have gone into the desert and "evolved" into copper blagonga. your theory says one monster goes from one environment into 2 and adapts accordingly, but why couldnt the first monster go to one environment, adapt, and then move to the desert? You are saying that both monsters are not capable of evolution. that is clearly ridiculous.

You are speaking as if what you are saying is cannon and it is clearly not. it is only an idea.