User blog comment:Mckrongs/Monster Hunter 4 for the Nintendo 3DS/@comment-187.27.202.158-20130104173446/@comment-5946566-20130105130405

^ I don't know If you are replying me or the aWC, but I think that you are taking this too far. Is it a big deal for you if people's ideas are different than yours? In the XXI century? About something as a misterious monster that has been surrounded by rummors and fanmaded teories? People "spams" (say) that Goa can be a new species as much as you "spam" (say) that Goa is a new species. So don't be that intolerant.

I can't find any source about wath I said, but I just said that "I think they confirmed that Goa Magara is a new species", so I wasn't saying that Goa "is" a new species.

Also, I know that Goa Magara's body is similar to the classic Elder Dragons (four legs, two wings, tail and relatively long neck), but it doesn't mean that it must be an Elder Dragon. Deviljho's body is very similar to a dinosaur Bird Wyvern, but it is a Brute Wyvern. Something similar can happen to Goa.

@aWC: I think that be the flagship isn't enough to make a monster be a new species. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that Kushala was the MH2 flagship and it's an Elder Dragon, which is an already existing species.