User blog comment:Mckrongs/Monster Hunter 4 for the Nintendo 3DS/@comment-115.87.23.131-20120817065612/@comment-83.165.23.90-20120817181217

In my opinion, they always had preference for the most sold consoles.

PS2, a console that most of gamers had on it's time, has good enough graphics, good controller and very good sellings, suposing that it where perfect to start the saga.

Wii, thanks to the mainstream idea of "play moving your body", sold a lot and the games where not expensive. So Tri found an easy way to sell on Wii.

PSP was the exception. DS was like the PS2 of handhelds, because it sold a lot, but wasn't powerful enough to can play a game like monster hunter. This is why it was on PSP instead DS, also PSP has better sellings in Japan than in Europe or America.

But now, 3DS, as a portable, powerful, and with good sellings, is perfect to held a game like MH, maybe Vita has better graphics and 2 sticks but its sellings are low and PS3 is very good, too, but games are very expensive and is not portable. Also, 3DS has another great phenomenom, Pokémon, and put together MH and Pkmn suposes massive sellings in Japan.

Anyway, I agree that MH should be better on PS3 (or x360) because i prefer much more the control, and can add new monsters with expansions and DLCs.