User blog comment:Tigrexdestroyer45/Lagiacrus vs. Rathalos/@comment-5460283-20121206011545

OK I say neither would win overall in a who killed the most because they wouldn't need or want to attack each other normaly  unless   1)intruding on territory 2)too close to their young or 3) desperate for food

And in each of there would be a different scenario because it could either lean towards the lagi or los.

In the MH3 intro there happens to be a confrontaion for food and in this case it's the lagi in need of food. The lagi would probably know that this kind of confrontation normaly would a)lead to its death fire fire/poison or b) los runs away with its food. And the lagi attacks anyways and this time it got lucky because the los only runs away.

This is how would see this situation ^ flipped around:

Los is desperate for food. He sees a lagi with an aptonoth on the shore. He swoops down to get the lagi's kill. The los would probably know that this kind of confrontation normaly would   a) lead to its death by electrocution/strangling or broken wing/menbrane or b) the lagi would run away with its food. And the los attacks anyways and this time it got lucky because the lagi only runs away.

Now if the opposing monster actually attacked each other this might happen and rememder hungry animals lose proper judgement.

Scenario 1) Los rains fire balls and lagi fights back shooting electro balls in hope of hitting the los. Lagi gets hit by so many fire balls and dies on fire.

Scenario 2) Los swoops in raining fire balls. Lagi hits the los with an electro blast when the los is close enough to the ground. Then lagi comes in and stikes the final blow. Los dies of electrocution.

Scenario