User blog comment:Lord Loss/Monster Hunter Theory... Blog/@comment-4775842-20120902221823/@comment-4212769-20120907132613

That was an example for "Size does not matter (too much)" because you said that Fatalis cannot take down a Lao Shan Lung only because of the size... of course a rabbit cannot do as much as a dragon but that doesn't mean it's totally defenseless.

When a human weapon (a sword) with fire element does that much damage that a human can take Lao Shan Lung down, how can you say Fatalis couldn't? And again what shall Lao Shan Lung do to get rid of Fatalis? I can't do anything. It's equal if it can take down a Fortress or a whole mountain if it cannot defend itself the attacks will kill it over time. And Fatalis is really strong even with his fire balls, so why shouldn't it be able to kill Lao?

Why it would attack it when Lao Shan Lung is more than enough meat? It could take it as reserve for the next days or weeks. Maybe it is able to preserve the flesh in some way so it can still eat it in some time after it killed it.

Why do you ask a question with Raviente? That's a completely different situation! With this size it can also get a flying Fatalis. Why should Fatalis fight a monster that dangerous? Fatalis are intelligent enough to avoid fighting such a monster.

And you blame me for a bad comparison... >.>