User blog comment:Plexioth- xD/Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate/@comment-4827659-20120208220631/@comment-70.54.115.173-20120209094030

Wasn't the "incorrect information" incorrect in that sense that the article's writer wasn't familiar with Monster Hunter (claiming monsters from previous games were new) rather than showing that they were wrong contents of the game?

As in, the writer's source was accurate, but the writer didn't understand the minor details.