User blog comment:Mckrongs/Monster Hunter 4 for the Nintendo 3DS/@comment-26953474-20121009225702/@comment-74.106.84.167-20121010011534

the stupidest, ugliest monsters are the ones they choose to bring back. great.

where the hell are teo and luna? and the crabs?

anyway has anyone considered that these early monsters might not fit in?

3rd gen and up seem to have had a major focus on streamlining both the monster's forms and behaviors. standards for monster models also seemed to have risen.. all of the new monsters are so much more believable than the monsters in the early gens. every aspect of the game was improved and polished so much between 2 and 3 that i think that adding in old monsters without a similar makeover will disrupt the flow of the game and turn it into an awkward mess.

even the monsters reintoduced in mhp3rd didnt really fit well, and they were some of the best monsters( in terms of look and movement ) that mh1/2 had to offer.. with the exemption of naruga they were all boring and extremely repetitive. well, naruga may have been a bit repetitive but never truly boring. they were basically the same as they were in mhfu with barely any aesthetic changes and a couple new moves. and now we are bringing in monsters that were bad even for the early eras? after seeing that kut kus the same i dont think we can hope for any improvements on gypceros either.

And im not trying to bash the early monsters. im not trolling.

i just think some monsters have a time and place and id like you all to think about what you are asking for; you have to hunt these monsters after all.